[2009-2010] Top 1 Stainless steel Store stainlesssteelseamlesspipe.net Open 24/7

Rock bottom price, Safety ensure, Professional Service,Join Now!

12 Apr 2010

Get the Full Picture of Stainless steel seamless pipe thermal Imaging

A thermocouple was installed in a Stainless steel seamless pipe line for monitoring the temperature of the fluid. Because the piping was all stainless steel, the material surface was too reflective to directly observe the fluid level with the thermal imager. So, to improve emissivity enough to allow camera use, the engineer applied some black electrical tape around the area of the pipe where the thermocouple was installed. The thermal imager revealed that the pipe was less than one-third filled with fluid. The thermocouple was barely making contact with the fluid, resulting in erroneous temperature measurements. A vapor lock had produced the unwanted headspace.

A thermal imager may improve your monitoring and troubleshooting of equipment and products. The infrared (IR) camera can supplement or supplant traditional techniques, and provide insights about material storage, equipment heat loss, product moisture content and more.

For instance, plants normally use level indicators to monitor how much material is inside a tank. Yet, many sites increasingly are turning to IR cameras to do the same thing. They want to avoid false indications from level gauges — and the resulting risks of either running out of product or, worse, overfilling a tank that was supposed to be empty. As former President Reagan was noted for saying: “Trust, but verify.”

Typical thermal images show the contents of the container and give quantifiable verification of the material inside. Users, by applying their knowledge of materials and physics to the thermal differences they see with an imager, can deduce the level of fluid in a tank. Figure 1 clearly shows the liquid level because the tank contains two different materials: liquid and air in the headspace.

Because of that human deductive element, the meaningfulness of the examination depends upon the person’s knowledge and the type of result desired.

Thermal cycling

Tanks located outside undergo thermal cycling. During daylight, they and their contents absorb heat from the sun and the air, as well as from whatever processing might be taking place. During the night, they give up heat to the surrounding air. This thermal cycle and the different thermal capacities of the materials involved affect how accurately a thermal imager can measure product level.

Uninsulated tanks such as the one shown are highly thermally conductive. As night falls, the headspace begins to cool quickly while the liquid volume cools much more slowly. That makes the thermal gradient between the liquid and headspace readily apparent through a thermal imager. Typically the thermal difference is at its maximum two times a day — once in the morning and once in the evening.

At other times, it may not be possible to clearly identify the liquid level with the thermal imager because the liquid and the air in the headspace may approach the same temperature. Reflections from the sunlight during daylight also can make it difficult to observe thermal differences.

Of course, tanks hold materials other than liquids. Dry bulk materials tend to pile up against the sides and have very uneven levels. Thermal imagers enable you to see these irregularities (Figure 2). Also, many liquids contain particulates that may settle out inside the tank, forming a layer of sediment. This layer generally has different thermal properties than the liquid and, so, often can be identified by imaging.

Understanding what the tank is constructed of is important. Many tanks have low-emissivity shiny metal surfaces or insulated walls that make it difficult or impossible to observe internal thermal differences. Being aware of such factors is crucial when evaluating what a thermal imager appears to be telling you.

Use caution and apply knowledge!

For instance, look at the reactor image (Figure 3). The color temperature bar indicates that dark blue is approximately 95?F and the red at the top of the scale is more than 200?F. Notice the dark blue, apparently cool, band where the lid sits on the vessel. What we really are seeing is a very low emissivity ring of stainless steel around the top of this otherwise painted vessel. The painted portion has a much higher emissivity. The bare stainless steel actually is at the same temperature as the painted portions it contacts <em dash>—<em dash>more than 160?F, hot enough to seriously burn skin.

It is fairly obvious to use a camera to examine furnaces and ovens for heat loss. However, thermography also can offer insights for cooling equipment. For instance, a new process freezer for removing heat from cooked meat patties exhibited numerous areas of condensation on its exterior surface, indicating voids in the insulation system in the walls. The manufacturer drilled holes in the metal sidewalls of the freezer where the condensation was located, trying without success to find the voids. The exterior freezer walls were polished Stainless steel seamless pipe which is very highly reflective. The thermographer dried the areas of condensation, placed black tape over them, and then used the camera to pinpoint the coldest spot. He was able to drill a 2-in. hole at the exact location of the insulation void.

9 Apr 2010

What is the Difference Between 304 and 316 stainless steel pipe

The main difference between 304 and 316 stainless steel pipe is that 316 contains 2%-3% molybdenum and 304 has no molybdenum. The "moly" is added to improve the corrosion resistance to chlorides (like sea water). So, while 316 stainless steel pipe is generally considered more corrosion resistant than 304, depending on the nature of the corrosive media the corrosion rates of 304 and 316 could be similar.

Generally, SS 304/304L is assumed to be corrosion-resistant material. But when we come to Piping Specs with SS 304/304L MOC, its value is taken as 0.063 inches -- same for SS316/316L . Please explain.

We have a plant that produces fertilizer. In one section we mix 40% phosphoric acid and 98% sulfuric acid together in a ratio of 75-80 : 25-20 phosphoric acid:sulfuric acid. After that the mixture is cooled to a temperature of 80 degrees C. What is the best material of construction for transfer piping? The existing material, 304 stainless steel pipe, shows problems at the welds.

From a materials of construction perspective, this is a tricky mixture to deal with, especially at 80 degrees C and higher. Phosphoric acid is less corrosive than sulfuric acid. Pure phosphoric acid has no oxidizing power but commercial phosphoric acid contains impurities such as fluorides and chlorides that can significantly increase its corrosivity. The corrosivity of sulfuric acid depends on many factors including temperature, concentration, the presence of oxidizing or reducing impurities, velocity effects, and solids in suspension.

It is usually not wise to select materials of construction for sulfuric acid handling equipment based only on published corrosion data since corrosion by sulfuric acid is a complex phenomenon. Small differences in impurities, velocity, or concentration can significantly impact the corrosion rate. Halides generally increase corrosion while aeration or the presence of oxidizing agents usually increases the corrosion rate of non-ferrous materials and reduces the corrosion rates of stainless steel pipe alloys. I strongly recommend laboratory corrosion studies be run on your specific stream as a part of your material of construction selection process.

I have a large storage tank of 93% sulfuric acid. I am having excessive corrosion of the top of the 4-inch carbon steel outlet pipe. I am thinking of replacing the outlet pipe with Schedule 120 carbon steel pipe. Is there any more resistant material, insert, or coating you could recommend for increased life?

Carbon steels are only acceptable for 93% sulfuric acid when fluid velocity is low (< 3 ft/sec). For 4-inch diameter piping or less with velocities up to 5.9 ft/sec, 316L stainless steel pipe is a good choice. For velocities higher than 5.9 ft/sec, Alloy 20Cb-3 (UNS N08020) has been used successfully. For additional information, consult NACE Recommended Practice RP-0391 "Materials for the Handling and Storage of Commercial Concentrated (90 to 100%) Sulfuric Acid at Ambient Temperatures."

In your question, you said you are experiencing problems with 304 stainless steel pipe at the welds. If this is the case, you might consider moving to 304L stainless steel pipe. Low carbon versions of austenitic Stainless steel seamless pipe like 304L are designed to eliminate problems associated with carbide precipitation and chromium depletion at welds. If 304L doesn't work, try gradually moving up to a higher alloy. Possible candidate materials in order of generally increasing corrosion resistance are: 316L stainless steel pipe, 20-type alloys like 20Cb-3, higher chromium Fe-Ni-Mo alloys like Alloy 31, and nickel-base molybdenum-chromium alloys like C-276.

7 Apr 2010

Get Stainless steel pipe Specifications Right in the Beginning

My company couldn’t see all the fuss. We had been hired by Bechtel as a subcontractor for the ill-fated Goro project to refine nickel ore in New Caledonia. Bechtel wanted us to match its pipe specifications. To us, this was just another symptom of a bloated project. We used to joke that Bechtel had two engineers for toilets: one for the men’s room and one for the women’s room. Looking back, Bechtel’s approach made sense: get the Stainless steel pipe specifications right or live with a project fraught with headaches — never mind other minor issues, i.e., safety, reliability and profitability.

The first decision in establishing a pipe standard is choosing whether it will be based on function or condition. A function-based specification would be something such as a sewer pipe or vent duct. A condition-based specification would discriminate between sewer pipe for corrosive versus sanitary service. Usually, a condition-based specification is best.

Collecting information is the next step. Pipe specifications often are presented in tables kept in massive volumes. What’s missing is supporting information explaining the basis for decisions like the choice of type 316 stainless steel over type 304L, or selection of Inconel 601 instead of Inconel 600. This omission in company records almost justifies the reluctance I’ve witnessed to challenge pipe specifications.

Once information is collected, you should budget time for careful analysis by a consultant. The idea is to look for discrepancies between the pipe specifications and for areas of improvement. For example, Trevor Kletz, in his book “Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design,” suggests eplacing fiber gaskets with spiral-wound gaskets because their leak rate is lower.

With the analysis complete, it’s time for a meeting. Bring together maintenance staff, project engineers, vendors and contractors to pencil in the details of the new pipe specifications. Leave detailed discussion of any contentious points to follow-up meetings. Rely on empirical data!

Sadly, plants seldom use one important source of empirical data — the corrosion coupon, which is a welded strip of metal designed to be inserted into a process. Instead, they allow analysis of the effects of corrosion on parent metal and welds. Coupons, which also can be used for gasket materials in some applications, provide real data well beyond those found in textbooks and from laboratory analysis, which seems artificial by comparison. The downside is exposure time; material evaluation takes months. But, believe me, it’s worth it.

Consider what happened on another project. We had to handle a feed stream of aluminum chloride added to a stream containing wet chlorine gas and vaporized titanium tetrachloride. A world-renowned valve material expert claimed that zirconium oxide would survive our process. Being prudent, I suggested coupons but was overruled because of time constraints. The expert was dead-wrong! What we saw was quickly dubbed “the jawbreaker effect” by our operators. Over about six weeks, the balls in our ball valves shrunk, flaking away from thermal shock. Coupons would have saved us more than $1 million a/year in downtime during the next few years and justified a ball made of a more expensive ceramic.

With all basic facts now in hand, it’s time to schedule follow-up meetings to review the draft pipe specifications. The best format for these specifications consists of a single page summary followed by details, exceptions and references. The details should include gaskets, valves, fasteners (e.g., bolts), special fittings, construction aspects such as weld inspection and paint preparation, etc. If possible, review the specifications with your mechanics. They may want to pass on their wisdom on construction details.

Exceptions may exist, and where they do, they must be clarified and documented. Sometimes exceptions arise because a vendor can’t change a valve specification and an acceptable alternative hasn’t been found yet. In one company, we ordered a PTFE-lined plug valve and modified it to fit an actuator.

Keep the summary table relatively simple. It should include pressure rating; application, i.e., for which chemicals; connections, e.g., threaded or socket-welded; and material of construction. It’s best to isolate the summary table so that it’s compact and usable by those in the field.

References should include the ANSI number and the old pipe specification number it replaced if there is one. Clearly state temperature limits; separately cite test pressures for ambient pressure tests. If you must note vendor information, also try to include acceptable alternatives. Keep your options open with vendors. Saving a little money now on a sole-source contract often isn’t worth the headache later of finding a replacement when a part fails to meet quality standards.

An often-overlooked item is the cross-comparison table, which matches the new specifications against the old ones. This table is crucial for working with old vendors and old inventories.

Stainless steel seamless pipe specifications are one of the keys to safe plant operation. By not keeping them current or allowing them to become confusing or hard to use, you may encourage deviation from good engineering practices. Make specifications simple and easy to follow.

2 Apr 2010

How are different classes of Stainless steel pipe used

The three major classes of Stainless steel pipe are:

Austenitic: Chromium-nickel-iron alloys with 16-26% chromium, 6-22% nickel (Ni), and low carbon content, with non-magnetic properties (if annealed - working it at low temperatures, then heated and cooled). Nickel increases corrosion resistance. Hardenable by cold-working (worked at low temperatures) as well as tempering (heated then cooled). Type 304 (S30400) or "18/8" (18% chromium 8% nickel), is the most commonly used grade or composition.

Martensitic: Chromium-iron alloys with 10.5-17% chromium and carefully controlled carbon content, hardenable by quenching (quickly cooled in water or oil) and tempering (heated then cooled). It has magnetic properties. Commonly used in knives. Martensitic grades are strong and hard, but are brittle and difficult to form and weld. Type 420 (S42000) is a typical example.

Ferritic: Chromium-iron alloys with 17-27% chromium and low carbon content, with magnetic properties. Cooking utensils made of this type contain the higher chromium levels. Type 430 is the most commonly used ferritic.

Two additional classes worth mentioning include Duplex (with austenitic and ferritic structures), and Precipitation Hardening stainless steel, used in certain extreme conditions.The austenitic microstructure is most commonly used for knives and cooking utensils. It is very tough, hardened through a process that consists of heating, cooling and heating. It resists scaling and retains strength at high temperatures.

Both ferritics and austenitics are used in kitchenware and household appliances. Austenitics are preferred in the food industry and beverage equipment due to the superior corrosion resistance and ease of cleaning. Type 301, for example, is an austenitic stainless steel, with 17% chromium, 7% nickel, and .05% carbon, and is widely used for institutional food preparation utensils.

You can easily make do with the lesser quality cookware for most oven use. For stovetop cooking, however, don't skimp on quality; buy only the better ones. Most manufacturers of high quality cookware use stainless steel similar to the Type 304 grade, with thick heat diffusing bottoms. Metals that provide better diffusion of heat, such as copper and aluminum, are attached to the bottom for heat diffusion, to prevent hot spots and uneven cooking.

Low quality cutlery is generally made out of grades like 409 and 430 (ferritic), while the finest Sheffield cutlery uses specially produced 410 and 420 (martensitic) for the knives, and 304 (austenitic) for the spoons and forks. Grades like the 410/420 can be hardened and tempered so that the knife blades will take a sharp edge, whereas the more ductile 304 stainless is easier to work and therefore more suitable for objects that have to undergo numerous shaping, buffing and grinding processes.

The best quality Stainless steel seamless pipe have a high carbon content, and usually have molybdenum and vanadium in their composition.